When I ran my Wildlife Damage Control.com company I received a fair amount of say, e-mail that disagreed with me. I provide it here to help people learn just how loving animal rights activists are.
-----------------
Okay, so it isn't all hate mail. Some of the letters are just telling me they disagree with me. But using the term hate mail gets more attention. I love getting hate mail. I would prefer a more reasoned discussion of the animal rights issue but then if the discussion was reasoned, we wouldn't have very much to talk about, would we?:). One of the dirty little secrets the media likes to continue is the notion that people who love animals are thereby kind to humans. I think the following e-mails as I add them will demonstrate that there is some real foolishness out there if not human hatred.
Now are all animal rights protest industry activists mean to people? Certainly not. I have actually met a couple that, although extremely confused in their world view, were kind sociable people. But as the pro abortionists like to argue, these animal rights activists have created a climate of hate. I just would like to expose the climate of hate created by various animal rights protest industry supporters.
As a standing policy in WDC, we always respond to all hate mail. (We also respond to legitimate questions as well :) We always provide full information on how people can get in touch with us. I always include my full name, mailing address, phone number, fax number, e-mail and web site address.
We have removed the e-mail address of the people who sent in this foolishness to protect them. I have also edited the format (not the content) of their letters to save space. I also include my responses.
Enjoy. We welcome the opportunity to debate animal rights protest industry proponents whenever we can. When you have a forum, feel free to let me know. Otherwise, feel free to write articles, I will try to get them published for you.
I have a new page dedicated to my conversations with one person! Yes you read that right, one person. She was rather copious in her writing. Be ready for a 30 second plus down load.
Click ARHATEMAIL! A European hate mail arhatemail2 The Best of ARHATE MAIL
I even get hate mail from the right wing.
----Original Message-----
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2000 7:58 PM
Subject: (no subject)
you're a nutcase hidin behind the bible you've been Berkshires too long
My Response:
Thanks for the smile today. Besides your bad grammar and incomplete sentence, you might want to know that I don't live in the Berkshires.
I am also adding your statement to my hate mail pages. It doesn't get much better than this.
Happy New Year. I also think you are worth more than a billion animals.
Stephen Vantassel
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2000 1:20 PM
Subject: appalled
I am greatly disappointed that you have chose (like the Immoral Minority) to use Jesus of Nazareth (The Prince of Peace) as a forum for attacks on them (ecologists, vegetarians) that have found Spirit to God through the natural world. Someday may your closed minded hate mongering find the love that your saviour possessed....limiting God to a narrow agenda is definately a Christian > Church taught value......have your fear, it's yours. Lord save us from your 'followers'
I responded
Thank you for your love filled response. I am confident that your natural path to spirituality has given you great insight in your loving words. Unfortunately, your vision of Jesus is incredibly myopic. Jesus claimed to be the only way to God. See John 14:6. Peter reaffirmed this claim in Acts when he asserted there is only one name under heaven by which mankind can be saved. Yes, the Christian church has been faithful in its witness that Jesus is the only way to heaven. Yes, the truth does offend many people that is why Jesus said he was a stumbling block to the Jews and foolishness to the Greeks. It is obvious as well that you decided to attack before reading. You failed to read all of the information attacking the animal rights movement. Click http://www..com/politics.htm There you would know that I am very much an environmentalist. I just don't worship animals or the earth. If you took the time, you would know that I would very much like to see responsible environmental policies established. I am tired of seeing excellent habitat destroyed simply because some person has to have his mansion there. But unlike some so called environmentalists, I don't think that trapping and eating meat=killing the earth. thanks for writing. You demonstrate again just how ignorant the world is about the role of trapping and the Christian religion. You emphasize more and more the need for my site to show the world the truth. One more thing. About hatemongering. Spare me. Why not talk to the Animal Liberation Front and talk to them about hate? Trappers have not been implicated in the attacks on any humans.
She Responded
I assume since your and my vision of hell and heaven are quite different that any further discussion might be fruitless but who knows. Yes, the christian (capital C would assume that Jesus of Nazareth has anything to do with it) church has upheld a doctrine that Jesus as an idol is the only way to 'heaven'. Unfortunately for this belief, the rewrites of the 'holy' bible in the 4th and following centuries by the Council of Nicea and other control freaks didn't expunge the words .... "my father's house has many rooms" and the sermon on the mount and that we were extolled by Jesus that we could "do greater things than I". All of this exclusiveness and 'ignorance' (your term) have created the fear, original sin, cringing flawed humanity stuff that is legendary in the church to convince humans that we need an intercessor between us and God, Quite the opposite that Jesus came to teach....that we and God are One.... Welcome to the New Age, the old fear teachings of the church cannot overcome the Love that Jesus originally taught ! If it is important to cherry pick certain verses out of the bible as Truth than why not pick different ones. Actually there are many devout Christians I've met that do live the Spirit (Habitat folks > etc.), not the> Church's fear laws (the modern pharisees) p.s. the Acts of the Apostles also makes it clear that> communalism is> inherantly Christian, so how has capitalism and> christianity become so> inherantly intertwined ?
I responded
One question do you know Koine greek? If so how many years have you studied it? Most liberal seminaries don't teach their students the languages. What evidence do you have that the Church rewrote the Bible in the fourth century. It seems you also need a class in textual criticism (lower criticism). You have committed a typical liberal error. You assume a belief then throw out any scriptures that don't agree with those assumed beliefs. As for Early Church Communalism. First the church never gave up the concept of work and earning a living. The difference was that early Christians recognized the value of giving to their fellow believers and to the poor. Those values have not left the Church. Paul distinquished between true widows and the non-true widows (see Timothy). You also need to distinguish between the ideals of the faith and how we as fallen creatures fail to fulfill all that God wants. Jesus is my idol? That is funny. He is only an idol if he is not God.
She Responded
Oh my god! The "L" word...how horrible to follow the teachings of a 'typical' Liberal like Jesus in an age where the mainline church backers (that's DIY?) are committed control conservatives........ Yes, the Council of Nicea did 'edit' (actually they decided what was 'heretical' and therefore who they could burn at the stake) and through organized government (sound like Iran?) moves stamp out what they could of other beliefs that didn't fit what the emporer needed for a state religion.....ever read any of the other gospels (damned to hell heretics et al.), Essene, Gnostic etc. that harken back to a time when things were different between the teachings of Jesus and his followers? Did Jesus tell the 'holy' church that these other gospels were not his words ? The church has definately not taken the lead on 'love thy neighbor' and the poor, in spite of Jesus' urgings....actually they specialize in what you're defending, theological conservatism, priest-caste, and witch-burning (in all it's forms including the recent 'moral majority' censorship moves). You can have the pharisee version of Jesus (Saul and his 'conversion' along with all it's thou shalt and thou shalt not's) that > is just some > people's (oh but they're apostles or whatever somehow different than you and I!) commentary or you can have the prince of peace, the sermon on the mount, the only two commandments (God and Love)..... Love or Fear, it's all in the choosing.....why throw out James (Ch. 2)who was pretty specific that all the pious talk was just that, talk.....I would suppose that could be too inclusive for the christian church and would leave their hierarchy (Graham, Falwell, Robertson) in tatters but would promote the followers of Gandhi, King, and Matthew Fox (more> heretics) > >
I responded
You don't even know what I believe. You didn't even answer my question about knowing Greek. As I stated before you have simply adopted a world view and then gone to the Bible with that world view and threw out what didn't fit. I guess my comment about the Gnostic texts really hit a nerve. I guess I must have been right. Your comments about Paul are truely unfortunate. I guess Paul was correct there will be those who come to the Church as wolves in sheep's clothing. You also didn't prove that the Council of Nicea edited the Bible. They interpreted the Bible but I don't see how they edited the text. As someone who knows Greek, I must say that I think there conclusion was correct. Jesus is God and not a god like the Arians suggested. Witch burning. Hmm. I guess you want to compare that with what happened in Hitler's Germany. Remember those Lutherans etc. were extremely liberal. They no longer believed that the Bible was the word of God aka the impact of Wellhausen theory. Has Christianity made mistakes. Absolutely. We have failed to perfectly follow the Word of God both in flesh and in paper that He gave us. However, our failure does not invalidate either. Here again you cherry pick your verses. You like those words of Love and peace. But you forget that those words are written along with contend for the faith, beware of the leaven of the Pharisees. As for James 2. I love the book of James. It says that if you have faith you must have good works. I say amen to that. But we are saved by faith not by works. However, works are evidence that we have true faith. It is sad that you have never really met Biblical Christianity. I would suggest you spend less time creating straw men and engaging Biblical Christians with a desire to know what we really believe, not what some professor or t.v. show tells you what we believe. I thought your statement on Billy Graham was foolish. He is by no means a hell fire preacher. But he does correctly witness to the truth that Jesus is everything the Apostles said he was. Why don't you spend some time reading some Christian theologians like Calvin, Hodge, Erickson. But don't let this activity stop you from learning Greek.
She Responded
No, I adopted MY view (I am in God's image)....as a 'failed, miserable sinner' I have faith that God didn't create junk that needs tyrants like Constantine or King James (or Billy Graham ala Richard Nixon/Ronald Reagan) to tell me what True Spirit is all about. The church has failed, and will continue to fail, to live up to the > convenant Jesus presented for our relationship with God as > long as they > need to control..."Love thy neighbor" is not disregarding what Jesus said.....listening to Paul talk about thou shalt and shalt not is disregarding what Jesus wanted to bring to the world.....Love and openness Remember Gandhi is damned to hell under your 'faith' definition along with Black Elk, Bahallah and many other's that follow the Spirit of Jesus...you can construe the bible (via your teacher's interpretation > of Greek or not, there are other's, liberals as you call them that differ, - or gnostics or essenes) to be whatever suits the nervousness about your being actually being one with God....I'd rather spend eternity with Spirits like Gandhi then control freaks like Robertson, Falwell, and Graham. They are the > christian churches leaders unless you make a stand for> Truth (that comes from within) and Love ("God is Love" is disregarding the word of God?)....but then again you don't believe that that's really what God's about then, if 'the word', for all it's contradictions and > inconsistencies (and editing) is more important than Spirit.... end of story p.s. I have no issue with eating meat and spirituality ... I choose not to eat meat to help Me with my spirituality (not yours or anyone else).... as in other things, if you feel OK with your spirit and flesh eating then why be defensive? No one can make you feel defensive unless you have issues with who you are....trusting one's self to know God is rarely a christian church taught ethic...being born sinful and all >
I responded
Yes, you have understood Christianity correctly. Either Jesus is the way the truth and the life or he isn't. It is really quite simple. Jesus didn't say, I am a way or a truth or a life. The definite article is there. I am not ashamed of it. If that means that Ghandhi is in hell and eternal separation from God than that is the way it is. I am not God. I didn't make the rules. I am simply one who must respond to the truth whether the truth bothers people or not. Let me ask a question is Hitler in hell? Is anyone in hell? Again, I am still waiting for an answer on your greek skills. I would also like an answer on why you consider yourself a Christian. Given your anger at the church I don't know why you would even want to associate with the title. But perhaps I have misunderstood your posts. Finally, I am no more defensive about my privilige in Christ to eat meat than you are about your belief that Christ is only one way. I am constantly amazed at how liberals scream and cry about us radical bigoted conservatives. Yet, you are bigoted about people who believe that there is one truth. Why do you feel the need to convince me of the single truth that there is no single way to heaven? Again you still create straw men. I never even mentioned Nixon or Reagan. What have they to do with the truth that Jesus is the only way to heaven. Those who deny Christ, cannot enter heaven. I think you are extremely hurt by someone in your past. I think you need to get over that. Stop spewing your venom at me. I didn't hurt you. It is quite unloving.
She Responded
Yes , you have understood me right, I am a Christian. Not by your standards, undoubtedly. But "like a little child" have grown from a church-going hypocrit, through atheisism, to imbrace the Christ consciousness which outshines any 'rules' that the church can try to put on humanity.......Love over Fear, only a non-Christian could deny that....why do the Bahai's, Buddhists, Hindu's, Sufi's etc. that I know embrace Christ's love more than the fear-mongerers that control the church that bears His name.... If that's venom to you (burning coals) so be it.... p.s. If anything is a 'red-herring' it is your 'research' into my greek skills. Relevant ? Only if your religion is based on your fears, you decide...
I responded
You are funny. You certainly don't read my posts very well do you. I have some questions, one of them three times now. You don't know Greek do you. Still waiting for the proof that the Church Fathers at the Council of Nicea changed the Bible. (let me save you some time, they didn't) But do let me know where you find your proof. Christ Consciousness. Could you be more vague. Given the venom, the mischaracterizations and straw man arguments you have used against me, tell me how you have adopted this Christ consciousness. It is the Bible not personal choice that tells us what it means to be a Christian. You argue like someone who says, I believe in driving consciousness but I am tired of the rules of the road. Love is a meaningless word without concrete examples of what it means. Remember the sexual revolution of the 60's they talked about free love. is that love? is love a feeling or is love an act? Is love a duty? You have again tried to use the name of Christ to support beliefs that Christ never would have supported. He soundly criticized the pharisees. But he never criticized them for believing in the God of Israel. Bahai would have us believe that the Baal worshippers are also going to heaven. It is clear you don't know much about truth or the nature of theology. You certainly don't know much about historic Christianity. Then again why would you. You chose to attend a seminary that doesn't believe in Christianity. I think the word is whited seplechures. Look great on the outside but inside full of dead men's bones. I don't quite think you have thought through your statement on fear. I read proverbs and it says the fear of Yahweh is the beginning of wisdom. I think that is your problem. You believe in cheap grace. Grace given without responsibility. You want God to grant heaven to everyone despite what they believe. You still haven't answered my question on hitler. Do you read my posts or do you simply have a mantra that you need to crank through in order to go to heaven?
She Responded
Simple... I know French, Spanish better than Greek (still irrelevant) Council of Nicea actually created most of what you see in the current bible (all other versions were cast aside and followers branded as heretics, something you obviously applaud). Many theologians have documented this. Christ consciousness is not vague (what part of Christ's Love is vague?) Driving consciousness sounds good to me. How would Jesus drive ? Love is all of the above (act, feeling, duty, free) If we are to believe individual verses of the bible we will have many contradictory statements, only you decide (or your theologians, whatever)......leaves us only with the Spirit which has continuing revelation right through to today..... If you are in a space of Love you reveal God's will for humanity, today or 2,000 years ago. The Inquisition, Witch burning, Cruscades, McCarthyism, Slavery, Homophobia (please Jerry tinky-winky on the Teletubbies?) are all evil (live spelled backward) that has had to be unearthed by marginalized Christians while the mainstream 'theologians' defended it. Even our wars are heartedly embraced by christian leadership (Christ and war together?) but again any twisting of the bible can come up with to equate the two. Beware of Matthew Fox, Patrick Henry, and Meister Eckhart, they may all just be evil liberal minions, out to distort (or at least to unshackle control over) humanity... Love is a Christian family value
I responded
Thank you for finally answering one question, I think. Are you claiming to be able to read Koine Greek? Since you claim many theologians state that the Council of Nicea created the present bible. Could you list three of those theologians. I would also like an answer to the question. If the Council of Nicea created this bible why is it that we have papyri from the end of the first century? Why do we have four N.T. text families. It would seem to me they did a rather poor job. Here is another question. Irenaeus strenuously argued against the gnostics. Scholars thought he exaggerated the problem. But when we discovered the Nag Hammadi texts, what do you know. We found out that Irenaeus didn't tell us the half of it. As I stated earlier. Your arguments against Christianity stem not from knowledge but from some bad experience you have had. That is sad. But remember we can give our allegiance to Jesus of Nazareth as long as we have breath. I think your Homophobia statement says volumes. As for Jerry Falwell and tinky winky. If you took the time to research it you would know that he was no where near the first person to make the connection. Read that Fundamentalist magazine known as Brill's Content magazine. I believe the article came out 4 months ago. YOu will see the media treated Jerry wrong there. Oh yea, in case you didn't know Brill is NOT a CHRISTIAN magazine. If memory serves, Jerry Falwell is also an Adulteryphobe too. And I believe he is a fornicationphobe. Funny these are all actions that are condemned in Scripture. I think he is a liarphobe too. I think the devil is supposed to be the father of lies. You also haven't taken credit for Hitler. If I have to take credit for the crusades, witch burning etc. You should step up and take credit for Hitler. Liberal theology destroyed the ethos of Germany. Just don't forget that Your Ghandi whom you think is such a great guy followed a religion that taught women should kill themselves when their husbands die. By the way, what has hinduism done for India? Again you like to cherry pick your problems. I am telling to meet the Biblical Christ. He is the issue. As for the contradictions in the Bible. I will ask the same question I ask everyone who says this. List them. Okay, list 5. You are both venomous and funny. Love is a family value it is also a Christian value but what is love and what is a family? Scripture defines these terms and give concrete examples to explain them. You need to as well. Are you showing me love? Not according to your definition. You are trying to convince me I am wrong. yet BHai says we are all correct. According to my definition, you are. Because you think I am in error. YOu care enough about me to try to show me I am wrong. However, I just wish you would stop with the straw men and the false arguments. You are quite myopic in your view of Christianity. I would suggest you visit the world and see what happens when Biblical Christianity has not taken place. And I don't mean from a five star hotel.
I think that is enough! I will end this correspondence.
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 1:57 PM
To: Webmaster@.com
Subject: Your site
How gross! I can't believe the things on your website. > Making fun of the animal rights quotes, selling death chambers and saying that it's great becuase you can see them as they die, ......... How sick this is!!! From: J.W.
My Response:
You obviously don't understand the law, nature, or the facets of our business. The co2 chamber is recommended by various anti groups for the killing of animals. They tell us it is humane. Perhaps you should complain to the HSUS, Fund for Animals et al. As you probably don't know we can't use drugs because we are not veterinarians. So what would you like us to do? Drown them? I know you probably are thinking, why kill any animal? Well what if it is sick? We have rabies in Massachusetts. What about the law? We are not allowed to relocate ANY wildlife. So perhaps you should educate yourself a little more before shooting your mouth off about something you don't understand. I have a question. If we can't see the animal, how are we to know when it is dead? I make fun of animal rights quotes because they are profoundly foolish. If you took the time, and we hope you will, to look at the rest of the site, you would see that it contains less humorous critiques of the anti movement. Thanks FOR your post. It confirms to me more and more how little animal activists know. Stephen Vantassel Wildlife Damage Control "
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 1999 12:20 PM
To: stephen@.com
Subject: God's judgement
Dear sir,
God will judge you for the misleading you do. I will pray for you, as you shall need it. It is better that a millstone be tied around your neck and be cast into the river than to face his judgement for your misleading. Even one thing befalleth them: as the one dieth, so dieth the other; yea, they have all one breath, so that a man hath NO pre-eminence above a beast. Ecclesiastes 3:19
hoping you'll try love,
"Heaven is by favor; if it were by merit your dog would go in and you would stay out." > Mark Twain (1835-1910)
WDC response
Thank you for your funny e-mail. It is indeed very sad that you don't even have the courage to put your full name and address on your posts. I guess your god(s) isn't/aren't strong enough to protect you.
I especially appreciated your quote from Mark Twain. I guess no one told you that he was an atheist. I see you get your theology or lack of it from a good source.
As for me and my house we will serve the Lord. That is the God of the Bible in case you weren't aware of Him. He is also called Jesus Christ. Feel free to let your animal rights protest industry friends know that I am still waiting to debate them. I look forward to showing the world the truth.
As for Eccles. certainly you can try to do better. The point of the book if you ever take time to read it is that the world from a human standpoint is certainly foolish. Only when we accept God's ways does life on this earth make any sense. Of course I haven't even mentioned how Jesus said, I am paraphrasing here, that we are worth more than many sparrows. This is a little known fact many so called Christian vegetarians like to avoid.
Stephen Vantassel
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 1999 8:55 PM Our friend continues:
> Subject: Re: God's judgement
You are an amazingly ignorant man. enjoy your life. you shant have any after it. Heaven is by favor; if it were by merit your dog would go in and you would stay out. Mark Twain (1835-1910)
WDC RESPONSE
Ignorant, is that the best you can do. I have been a follower of Christ, the Biblical Christ that is not some Gnostic jesus, for many years. I am saved by grace through faith. I cannot save myself, nor can anyone for that matter. Salvation is a gift of God. Try reading Galatians and Romans. You will get the point.
It seems to me that you are the ignorant person. I have a Bachelors degree in Biblical Studies and Philosophy. I also have a Master's degree in Old Testament and am presently studying for a Ph.D. in theology. I may be arrogant. I may be wrong. But I am not ignorant.
As for the after life. My boat is tied to Christ. The Christ of the Bible, not the Nag Hammadi texts.
I hope you become a follower of the Biblical messiah too.
Stephen Vantassel
Our friend continues again!!!
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 1999 7:48 PM
Subject: Re: God's judgement
I am glad you have so much time to write arguing letters back and forth. I however, have been brief to save time for the online ministry I have where we win back the lost for Jesus. If you wish to actually debate inteligently sometime I would be happy to do so on my irc channel at a scheduled time. Otherwise I havent got time for misleaders like you. good day
Speak to the Earth, and it shall teach thee. Job 12:8
WDC Responds
Debate what? That Jesus wasn't a vegetarian? Sure. That Jesus murdered fish? sure. Let me know. Don't forget, God has feathers.
Stephen Vantassel
Readers Note. As of Nov. 10, 1999, I have not received information or a date regarding when I could speak before her group on the facts regarding animal damage control.
Hello,
I would like to make a comment about "Respect all Life." Actually, a few comments......
1) Why do you feel the need to label people that respond to you in disagreement as ....Anti's??????
2) I would guess that you would label me as an Anti because I choose to be a compassionate person and believe as Albert Schweitzer did that all live is sacred.
3) I do not support abortion and would like you to show me the data to prove that Animal Rights people are ..... I quote you "Why is it that so many anti's are actually pro-abortion." Likewise, I would welcome research on this from any of your readers. (Get the facts before you publish)
4) So, watching a baby being born is gross? I guess you have never had the privilege of seeing a new life come into the world. Well, I can only tell you that it is a beautiful masterpiece from God.
I hope you can someday put aside your preconceived notions and experience the true miracle of a baby being born and just let yourself be in awe. You don't need to always act macho you know.
I hope that someday you are able to expand on your thinking and try to understand that nothing is black or white, just alot of gray.
Thank you,
Deborah ps....I'm not at my computer ... if you would like to respond
WDC responds
In answer to you question, you are an anti. You believe in animal rights like Schweitzer, then the label is accurate. I think that Dr. Schweitzer was wrong.
I believe that life should be respected but all life is not sacrosanct. Anti's like Schweitzer did not think that humans should even kill mosquitoes. I think we can and in many situations should.
You see the difference between me and you is that I believe that species are to be protected, not individual animals. I don't want to see any wildlife made extinct but I also believe that animals were put here for our use.
I am glad you are pro life. You are only the second anti who has stated they were. I must say though, do you write letters to abortionists who are on the net and tell them to respect all life? I doubt it.
I also fail to get the baby being born argument. Perhaps you can enlighten me. I do think watching the process of a baby being born is gross. All that blood, fluid etc. It doesn't mean it is evil. Just gross. Some people think my ownership of tanned fur is gross. I don't agree. They think skinning an animal is gross, I don't.
Finally, I am glad that you consider you disagreement with me a gray area. What part do you think you actually agree with?
Stephen Vantassel
Sent: Friday, October 29, 1999 3:14 PM To: stephen@.com
Do you charge for this service?? Thought so. Your Web page states that the animal rights protest industry is only in it for the money. Why would you say such a dumb thing? It does not cost to let live it cost to kill. Thats why your in the business, right?
WDC RESPONDS:
It is apparent that you haven't thought very long or hard about what you wrote here. First, you have failed to read the vast amount of free information located at my various sites. Information mind you that if the public actually followed would save the lives of countless millions of animals as well as reduce property damage.
Second, you obviously don't know the difference between a tax free organization and a taxable organization. Which one do you think I am? Here is a hint, people don't get a tax deduction simply because they hire me.
I have no problem with people making money. What offends me is that these protest industry proponents don't care about the animals, my web site proves that, they care about the money. The only way they make money is by creating crisis after crisis. That is why it is an industry.
Please take the time between carrying signs and protesting to actually learn to think before you write.
Stephen Vantassel
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 1999 3:15 PM
Subject: Feedback.
Editors note. Our animal rights activists here quotes me and then responds to it. Her statements will be placed in bold print.
> ""Meat is Murder" This statement assumes the position that an animal is my fellow human. Since it is not, how can my killing it be considered murder? If animals can kill other animals, why can't I, if I am one. If I am not an animal, why am I held to a moral position that no other creature in the world is held to. In > philosophy, we call this a category mistake."
Really, how often do you kill the animals you eat on your own or how often do you think other people kill the animals they eat?
""Love Animals Don't Eat Them" This bumper sticker of course plays on the notion that our love for animals is somehow the same as our love for people or children, or at the very least it should be close. The fact is one could very easily ask the AR activist, on what basis, should our love for animals prevent humans from utilizing this food source. The fact is I love animals because I make my living off them. I also love animals because as another bumper sticker states, They taste great."
If you took the food it takes to feed all the lifestock and used it for human consumption you could feed everyone in the world easily. Its not utilizing a food source its more like wasting a huge one that you arent looking at... If you took the food it takes to feed all the lifestock and used it for human consumption you could feed everyone in the world easily. More than 70% of U.S. grain is fed to farmed animals. (USDA, World Cereals Used for Feed, 4/91) It takes almost 7 lbs. of corn and soy to produce 1 lb. of pork. (USDA, Economic Research Service Cattle-Fax, 12/8/89)
WDC responds
I am not sure you have thought through your first criticism very well. I don't claim to kill my own meat or eat the animals I kill. For your information, it is against state law for me to use any portion of the animals I kill under the problem animal control permit. Since you animal rights activists have more pull with the legislature than us trappers, feel free to change that law.
As for your second point, I have responded to this claim in my article, the uneasy conscience of the animal rights movement located at the http://www..com/politics.htm
I would also challenge you to think of how many people could be fed if the animal rights movement used its vast economic resources to help people instead of lawyers. I doubt you care much about this as it is certainly more fun to "save an animal" than the bum on skid roe.
By the way, I am ready to publicly debate supporters of the animal rights protest industry. Just remember my name.
Stephen Vantassel